@cac_abq Gandhi noted satyagraha connects human action with divine truth. The principle finds its fullest realization in a messianic mode—an incarnational theophany of unequivocally supernatural calibration aligning with an immanent historical dynamism transforming all of created reality.
Image description
Original X alt text
Copy of tweet and quote tweets here: #
Extended description
Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge quoting Bonhoeffer Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: top1/ Source: archive.nickroutledge.org/post/1754530473966231763 Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. @Dan_Bowdoin 1/ I'm shocked by the text's first words (Bonhoeffer: "Honesty demands that we recognize that we must live in the world as if there were no God.") in the face of a transcendence immediately, totally, fully and indivisibly present and accessible here, now. t.co/bDltyS5ub4
Open original documentExtended description
Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge referencing Schleiermacher Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: Indeed Source: archive.nickroutledge.org/post/1697985192747520330 Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. @BrianZahnd Indeed, I'd aver Schleiermacher's 'cultured despisers' of religion describes 'religious' as much as 'non-religious' dismissal of Reality as fully, supernaturally here. Incarnation, a participatory threshold defined by passing over from God-belief into God-experience itself, then? t.co/RjZ2vVlTsS
Open original documentExtended description
Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Aṭṭār @noonessleep Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: two Jul11 posts Source: Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. Excerpt from tweet thread: Aṭṭār Christians who somehow manage to reconcile their faith with the sort of complacent, sneering scientism one would normally expect of a strident atheist or secular humanist are very puzzling. I had in mind smug dismissals of notions of enchantment (or, in a Barfieldian register, original participation). There's something genuinely bizarre about being at once a Christian and someone who thinks a participatory ontology is woo woo.
Open original documentExtended description
Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge quoting Cynthia Bourgeault Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: 2/ We resurrect Source: archive.nickroutledge.org/post/1474434779994996740 Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. @RichardRohrOFM @CACRadicalGrace 2/ We resurrect as transmutation, the simultaneous, dynamic conjunction of the Divine One and the affirmation of the moving constraint of our mortality. “It is both a realm in itself and the means by which this realm makes itself known." - Cynthia Bourgeault. t.co/ic9iOEcOKG
Open original documentExtended description
Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge quoting Niffari and referring to Bloch Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: 1/3 Source: archive.nickroutledge.org/post/1474170398442811404 Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. 1/3 Where Abd-ul-Jabbar Niffari asks, “Why do you look for God up there? He’s here! Here!", Ernst Bloch identified the functional atheism of dominative Christian culture’s denial of the supernatural immediacy and power of the living God among us, right here, right now. t.co/Q3ISRZmS4v
Open original documentExtended description
Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge quoting Moltmann Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: bottom Where Xian Source: archive.nickroutledge.org/post/1465320102568497157 Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. @nickripatrazone @poetinbabylon Where Xian theological sanction has effectively decried messianology as "the hobby of religious cranks" (Moltmann), perhaps it’s time to adventitiously ask, what does realized Christology mean, if not the Second Advent? Fingers and toes? Or the kingdom of peace in a new creation?
Open original document@lukeburgis 4/ Non-retributive justice does not succeed by tactic. It works because it consents to the mystery at the core of creation: our inescapable entanglement aligned with the hidden architecture of reality through which all life coheres—how things actually are—like it or not.
Image description
Original X alt text
Copy of tweet and image here:
Extended description
Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: Source: archive.nickroutledge.org/post/1959442597094826408 Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. 7/ To inhabit incarnation is to live that entanglement. God-with-us is not escape from biology but its depth—the political and embodied converging. Where Empire brings extraction and genocide, incarnation brings covenant and community; where death, resurrection breaking through. t.co/eF0cdoC7Hz
Open original documentExtended description
Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Sabine VanderLinden Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: Source: archive.nickroutledge.org/post/1962916374633971848 Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. Sabine VanderLinden: your point about physical embodiment being key to consciousness really makes me think about how much we might be missing in our understanding of awareness itself.
Open original documentExtended description
Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick quoting Catherine Keller Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: Source: archive.nickroutledge.org/post/1947359631602553151 Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. @SabineVdL @Plough To borrow Catherine Keller's term, consciousness isn’t a lonely spark but the local flare of an 'intercarnational' self—a fully entangled, co-evolving nexus through which the universe individuates, feels, thinks, and then diffuses again into the wider weave of relations. t.co/VhQx1Al2hd
Open original documentExtended description
Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: Source: archive.nickroutledge.org/post/1807433914258182310 Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. @SherPoint And, of course, to admit that such intelligence, available to all, is ultimately collective, non-local and interdependent means we must be prepared to change more than just our commonsense understanding of the universe, for the implications are staggering.
Open original document