Nick Routledge@nick_routledge
Reply to @nick_routledge

@Andrew__Roth 3/ How is this bastard claim upon immanence itself, overthrown? Through a response recoupling the material world with its transcendent dimension, experienced in concrete reality as a seismic shift in our sense of truth, meaning, relatedness, significance, morality and sanity.

Quoted or linked post

Nick Routledge@nick_routledge · 29 Aug 2022

4/ Naturally, First Nations eschatology anticipates world resurrection healing the Earth and us, as one - our fully incarnational calling to a fully relational life: "Not to turn from the world to God but to turn to God in the world" as Teilhard de Chardin describes it.

About the nature of the now in the ‘here and now’ – its teleology included - we are awash in counsel. About the nature of the here, a good deal less so. The oversight is not at all surprising. Hardly anyone seems to understand Marshall McLuhan’s point that a medium is not a neutral conduit of transmission that has little or no impact on the content of communication. One glance at the global reach of all major schools of thought devoted to making sense of the pulse of existence – whether scientific, religious or otherwise – clearly reveals a style of thinking that is inherently portable, a medium available to communities of recognition everywhere. This is the point. What of that part of the sum of psychological and material reality which simply isn’t portable? What, for example, of gnosis utterly inseparable from a slow, sustained experience of a particularized habitat?
Image description

Original X alt text

About the nature of the now in the ‘here and now’ – its teleology included - we are awash in counsel. About the nature of the here, a good deal less so. The oversight is not at all surprising. Hardly anyone seems to understand Marshall McLuhan’s point that a medium is not a neutral conduit of transmission that has little or no impact on the content of communication. One glance at the global reach of all major schools of thought devoted to making sense of the pulse of existence – whether scientific, religious or otherwise – clearly reveals a style of thinking that is inherently portable, a medium available to communities of recognition everywhere. This is the point. What of that part of the sum of psychological and material reality which simply isn’t portable? What, for example, of gnosis utterly inseparable from a slow, sustained experience of a particularized habitat?

When earth-attentive cultures assert that ‘wisdom sits in places’, they are claiming that an experience of the world and existence as we may fully participate in it, is not only sustained by an attunement to a particularized locale, but is specific to that place, too. Root and branch are in dynamic interplay in a single helix of presence. This begs the question: if wisdom indeed sits in places, are ‘wisdom traditions’ estranged from a sense-of-place but half-wise? Putting flesh on the word, if the supreme personal destiny which awaits us balances the path inwards with the path outwards, may we not safely deduce that where we are called to live the illuminated life matters wholeheartedly? What implications arise from enlarging our understanding of individual and communal experience in this light? And what, potentially, is the shape of a Covenant in which the human community embraces a dynamic, reciprocal relationship with the habitat of which we are an integral part?
Image description

Original X alt text

When earth-attentive cultures assert that ‘wisdom sits in places’, they are claiming that an experience of the world and existence as we may fully participate in it, is not only sustained by an attunement to a particularized locale, but is specific to that place, too. Root and branch are in dynamic interplay in a single helix of presence. This begs the question: if wisdom indeed sits in places, are ‘wisdom traditions’ estranged from a sense-of-place but half-wise? Putting flesh on the word, if the supreme personal destiny which awaits us balances the path inwards with the path outwards, may we not safely deduce that where we are called to live the illuminated life matters wholeheartedly? What implications arise from enlarging our understanding of individual and communal experience in this light? And what, potentially, is the shape of a Covenant in which the human community embraces a dynamic, reciprocal relationship with the habitat of which we are an integral part?

Painting with text fragment 'Redcoat'.
Image description

Original X alt text

Painting with text fragment 'Redcoat'.

Painting with text fragment 'One Coat'.
Image description

Original X alt text

Painting with text fragment 'One Coat'.

View this post’s context →

Context in the archive

Quoted by@MassimoFaggioli end/ Our hope for redemption, for personal and corporate resurrection? Plain, human-centered miscalculation, if it doesn’t include our partnered indivisibility with Creation. Concrete reality is the covenantal realm in which redemptive time comes to ground. Image: fall leaves.