Nick Routledge@nick_routledge
Reply to @MassimoFaggioli

@MassimoFaggioli @oss_romano Mazzarella critiques Thiel’s techno-eschatology; Ehrett, the posthuman right. Yet both remain inside modern cosmology where theology and politics unfold almost wholly within a reactive human frame. What if a coherent, generative response reopens the cosmological dimension itself?

Quoted or linked post

Nick Routledge@nick_routledge · 18 Mar 2026

@johnehrett @Plough 1/4 Ehrett identifies a real trap. But the essay remains inside it, unfolding almost entirely in abstraction—theology, biology, technology, politics—while the living world never enters the frame. Once creation drops from view, politics has only one substrate left: the human body.

View this post’s context →

Context in the archive

Quoted byRT @nick_routledge: @lukeburgis Seems the Rome formation risks a counter-mimetic vanguard—a 'Girardian' circle deploying a sacral warrant for converting the diagnostic instrument into an exemption claim. A more sophisticated, credentialed form of sacrificial violence, fluent in critique and now immune to it.Quoted by@lukeburgis Seems the Rome formation risks a counter-mimetic vanguard—a 'Girardian' circle deploying a sacral warrant for converting the diagnostic instrument into an exemption claim. A more sophisticated, credentialed form of sacrificial violence, fluent in critique and now immune to it.