Nick Routledge@nick_routledge
Reply to @johnehrett

@johnehrett @Plough 1/4 Ehrett identifies a real trap. But the essay remains inside it, unfolding almost entirely in abstraction—theology, biology, technology, politics—while the living world never enters the frame. Once creation drops from view, politics has only one substrate left: the human body.

Quoted or linked post

Nick Routledge@nick_routledge · 1 Oct 2025

@gilduran76 @WIRED 2/ Clearly, for Thiel, theology is just one organ: the whole body is control. First as 'metaphysics' (deny death with techno-immortality), then as politics (conjure a katechon to “hold back” chaos), then as infrastructure (surveillance, predictive policing, platform capture).

Image with an extended description available below.
Image description

Extended description

Tweet: Though his primary theological referent was Jewish messianism, Christian eschatology provided Benjamin a core theo-political motif—the anti-Christ. Not mythology but the System itself—a total machine of illusion, sacrifice and ruin—enthroned as progress, crowning itself destiny. Or, as Walter Benjamin noted, authoritarian surges or 'storms' as he called them, aren't a happenstance as much as an ontic inevitability constitutive to techno-modern 'progress' itself. Image of tweet here: "That things 'just go on' is the catastrophe."    ~ Walter Benjamin thanks to [Photograph of Walter Benjamin]

Open original document
View this post’s context →

Context in the archive

Quoted by@MassimoFaggioli @oss_romano Mazzarella critiques Thiel’s techno-eschatology; Ehrett, the posthuman right. Yet both remain inside modern cosmology where theology and politics unfold almost wholly within a reactive human frame. What if a coherent, generative response reopens the cosmological dimension itself?