Nick Routledge@nick_routledge
Reply to @nick_routledge

@alon_mizrahi 7/ When the System metabolizes resistance, eating it, only prophetic speech stands outside—the sole sovereign language left to counter the capture of being itself. It doesn’t argue with psychosis; it interrupts it. Not protest, but eschatology—the voice no model can counterfeit.

Image with an extended description available below.
Image description

Extended description

Excerpt from Virtues of Renewal, Wendell Berry’s Sustainable Forms (Culture Of The Land) 2018, by Jeffrey Bilbro. 71. Kaveny, Prophecy without Contempt, 288. Kaveny expands on this claim, arguing  that “the rhetoric of prophetic indictment is best understood as a sort of moral chemo￾therapy, a reaction to a potentially life-threatening distortion in ordinary, day-to-day  moral discussion. Deliberative discourse is, in fact, that ordinary form of moral discussion. . . . In some cases, however, our ordinary form of discussion can be gravely corrupted, perhaps by the incorporation of a false major premise, perhaps because of the  dependence on a mistaken minor premise. Such mistakes are made all the time in matters  small and large. In some few cases, however, the mistake is about such a fundamental  matter that it threatens to undermine the very possibility of moral and political reasoning within the community.  .  .  . Prophetic indictment relentlessly—and sometimes  ruthlessly—targets the corruption that, left unchecked, would undermine the possibility  of sound moral deliberation more generally” (287–88; see also 308–16). Berry’s use of the  prophetic mode parallels Walter Brueggemann’s description in his seminal Prophetic  Imagination, 2nd ed. (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2001). Other scholars have situated  Berry in the context of Old Testament prophecy: see Davis, Scripture, Culture, and Agri￾culture, and Todd Edmondson, Priest, Prophet, Pilgrim: Types and Distortions of Spiritual  186  Notes to Pages 75–81 Vocation in the Fiction of Wendell Berry and Cormac McCarthy (Eugene, Ore.: Wipf and  Stock, 2014), 47–54.

Open original document

Quoted or linked post

Nick Routledge@nick_routledge · 13 Sept 2025

@jamespoulos Ludwig cuts both ways: if "the limits of our language are the limits of our world", then expanding our expressive range enlarges reality. A vernacular flanking religious-and-secular defenses, smuggled inside ordinary language, doesn't just describe a bigger world—it creates one.

Copy of tweet here:

Text: Arthur Bradley and Paul Fletcher in The Politics to Come: Power, Modernity and the Messianic
Image description

Original X alt text

Copy of tweet here: Text: Arthur Bradley and Paul Fletcher in The Politics to Come: Power, Modernity and the Messianic

Extended description

Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Arthur Bradley and Paul Fletcher, The Politics to Come: Power, Modernity and the Messianic Recovered pictured passage; not a claim to the full source. Passage boundary: Only internal span omitted by saved first-book-paragraph ALT after eschatology and before Yet, at the same time. Do not replace the rest of ALT. Source: Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. There is nothing remotely new about philosophers appealing, whether positively or negatively, to the messianic as a political resource: Voltaire, Kant, Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Benjamin, Scholem, Rosenzweig, Cohen, Levinas and Taubes are only the most obvious names that belong to this long and distinguished history. Retained uncertainty: ["Known gap S004 visually recovered from selected original. Book's columns flow across the internal picture boundary; no imagined missing sentence added."]

Open original document

Extended description

Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick quoting Paul North Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: When he finally arrives Source: archive.nickroutledge.org/post/1885333342822031610 Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. @ncolloff Paul North: "When he finally arrives, what language will the Messiah speak?" The first made it clear enough. A tyranny of materialist and religious fetishism urges a summons beyond all prior secular and religious imaginaries or containment. A new Wording for a new reality, hear. t.co/YMvFCQvIvs Retained uncertainty: ["Known gap S004 visually recovered from selected original. Book's columns flow across the internal picture boundary; no imagined missing sentence added."]

Open original document

Extended description

Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick quoting Bonhoeffer and Hillman separately Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: What does the prophet mean Source: archive.nickroutledge.org/post/1864723067769065838 Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. @austeni What does the prophet mean by what they say? Jesus repeatedly asserts his disciples do not hear him. The mystery of the gospel, then, is radical: a circuit-breaker. As such, asked for the greatest commandment, Jesus says what? "Hear, O Israel! ..." First, hear the Kingdom aright. t.co/jWnHCDzM71 Retained uncertainty: ["Known gap S004 visually recovered from selected original. Book's columns flow across the internal picture boundary; no imagined missing sentence added."]

Open original document
View this post’s context →

Context in the archive

Quoted byRT @nick_routledge: @lukeburgis I once dismissed "possession" and "exorcism" as occult kitsch. But just now, watching rivalrous mimetics—war logic, genocide logic, nuclear logic—go total, seizing minds, narrowing futures, and demanding sacrifice, it lands as hard realism. Apocalypsis reads as exorcism at scale.Quoted by@lukeburgis I once dismissed "possession" and "exorcism" as occult kitsch. But just now, watching rivalrous mimetics—war logic, genocide logic, nuclear logic—go total, seizing minds, narrowing futures, and demanding sacrifice, it lands as hard realism. Apocalypsis reads as exorcism at scale.Quoted by@BretVDB @malcolmguite end/ Prophetic speech is exorcism's counter-spell. An archetypal irruption—truth sounded—it sets refiner’s fire to pseudo-order, evil’s veneers, and hollow abstraction, revoking its claim and rebinding the field to truth. Where the Word sounds, the Real can bear weight again.