end/ The prophets don’t conjure the eschaton—they embody it. Planetary Pentecost is not just descent, but gathering. Not conquest, but communion. Not speculation, but incarnation. The fire is real. The Body is one. The hour has come. Let those with eyes, see.
Image description
Original X alt text
Copy of thread here: Here’s William James: “...there lie potential forms of consciousness entirely different. We may go through life without suspecting their existence; but apply the requisite stimulus, and at a touch they are there in all their completeness...” “...No account of the universe in its totality can be final which leaves these other forms of consciousness quite disregarded. How to regard them is the question...At any rate, they forbid our premature closing of accounts with reality." Our prophets, of course, universally anticipate just such a bifurcation point at the planetary level - noospheric consciousness coalescing in a sunburst of revelation transcending the mystery of history. Ultimately, Abraham Joshua Heschel notes, “Mystery is surpassed by meaning.” It is... it is eschatology that puts an end to history. It is the transcendent breaking-in of eternity that plunges all human history into its final crisis.
32/ The Word doesn’t wait in temples or texts. The messianic doesn’t arrive with permission. It isn’t ratified by priests, pandits or mullahs. It moves. It arrives. Holiness is no longer postponed. The eschaton has broken cover. It is present and incarnate—and it builds.
![Copy of tweet thread here:
Tweet 1:
Just as a concrete definition is an impossibility, so it is much harder to give even an approximate definition of the word 'concrete' itself;... It is difficult, because one is brought face to face, on the very threshold, with the whole mystery of creation and even incarnation."
Tweet 2:
Simply put? Every resurrection requires a home address. Indeed, we only come home to concrete reality in so far as we and the world complete one another - the simultaneity of de Chardin's spiritualization of the material and materialization of the spiritual. Here, Moltmann:
Tweet 3: [Edited to fit alt-text]
Thus, redemption doesn't destroy the world…the da'wat becomes Paridaez Now.
Painting with calligraphy: “The colors of the grove and the voices of the birds will “restore immortality at the time when we shall come into the garden, thou and I.”](/media/1932907128253263989-GtMQyd7bsAA_S7P.jpg)
Image description
Original X alt text
Copy of tweet thread here: Tweet 1: Just as a concrete definition is an impossibility, so it is much harder to give even an approximate definition of the word 'concrete' itself;... It is difficult, because one is brought face to face, on the very threshold, with the whole mystery of creation and even incarnation." Tweet 2: Simply put? Every resurrection requires a home address. Indeed, we only come home to concrete reality in so far as we and the world complete one another - the simultaneity of de Chardin's spiritualization of the material and materialization of the spiritual. Here, Moltmann: Tweet 3: [Edited to fit alt-text] Thus, redemption doesn't destroy the world…the da'wat becomes Paridaez Now. Painting with calligraphy: “The colors of the grove and the voices of the birds will “restore immortality at the time when we shall come into the garden, thou and I.”