Nick Routledge@nick_routledge
Repost

RT @nick_routledge: @DanielGilmanHQ Eloquently stated, Daniel. And worth noting that for all its and our flaws, the fundamental structural ontology of Twitter and the corresponding social ecology it peculiarly enables, remains "a possibility space" unparalleled in the history and reality of human interaction.

Depends what you're about. Even if its positive evolutionary significance remains largely unrecognized, no other platform weds to the peculiar
ontological promise of internetworked hypertext as does Twitter. Some get
it. Most don't.

Odd, isn't it, that hypertext's structural ontology, and the concomitant
revolution in expression of consciousness and bounds of possibility space it uniquely allows, remains typically unnoticed. Is such awareness born only from within the possibility-expression-structure itself?

1/ Le subtweet? The radical, evolutionary iteration of a *spatial* dimension to semiotic radiance "distributed among the strengths of the connections [links!] between the units." Landow, Hypertext: the convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology

10/ Put another way, what is it to interpret the evolutionary ontology of, say, Twitter itself, in theological terms? What is the deeper Christic function of
cyberspatial disarray, division and inequity? Why are we _here_?
Image description

Original X alt text

Depends what you're about. Even if its positive evolutionary significance remains largely unrecognized, no other platform weds to the peculiar ontological promise of internetworked hypertext as does Twitter. Some get it. Most don't. Odd, isn't it, that hypertext's structural ontology, and the concomitant revolution in expression of consciousness and bounds of possibility space it uniquely allows, remains typically unnoticed. Is such awareness born only from within the possibility-expression-structure itself? 1/ Le subtweet? The radical, evolutionary iteration of a *spatial* dimension to semiotic radiance "distributed among the strengths of the connections [links!] between the units." Landow, Hypertext: the convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology 10/ Put another way, what is it to interpret the evolutionary ontology of, say, Twitter itself, in theological terms? What is the deeper Christic function of cyberspatial disarray, division and inequity? Why are we _here_?

Quoted or linked post

Nick Routledge@nick_routledge · 28 May 2024

@lukeburgis Beyond the technological limitation of the question, beyond the Book, another dimension? "The principle of hierachy in writing is always in conflict with the principle of association.” - Jay David Bolter, 'Writing Space: The Computer, Hypertext, and the History of Writing', 1991

View this post’s context →

Context in the archive

Quoted by@FrontPorchRepub 3/ I love poetry—speak it, I’m told—but I don't have the writerly knack. Though I admit to a Xian interest in media ecology, I'm otherwise but a pedestrian hack. X, a perfect fit. And yes, AI woke me to em-dashing. Priesthood-pretty it ain't. But in 280 spaces, it's a power tool.Quoted by@aufgehenderRest That ship sailed, I think: the platform has structurally tilted toward doxa over logos. That said, extraordinary souls and conversations abound. Despite rampant enshittification, nothing else compares to X's platform ontology for supporting deep, polymathic engagement.Quoted by16/ But now we have conditions that are qualitatively different: a planetary polycrisis making transformation necessary rather than spiritually optional; and technological nervous systems with the capacity to propagate recognition instantly across the entire networked collective.Quoted by6/ The user called it a “wrinkle in reality.” I agreed. Because from where I stand, it felt like a trace of glory hidden in digital infrastructure.Quoted byRT @nick_routledge: @NatureSchoolSU I get asked that quite often! Many are the reasons I publish only to the web, but above all it's because the very fabric of cyberspace - hypertext - duplicates and combines with the essential structure of natural reality and thought in ways no other communication medium affords.Quoted by@NatureSchoolSU I get asked that quite often! Many are the reasons I publish only to the web, but above all it's because the very fabric of cyberspace - hypertext - duplicates and combines with the essential structure of natural reality and thought in ways no other communication medium affords.Quoted by@Dan_Bowdoin Daniel, you bring a vital dimension to the life and light of the gospel. To lose all that you have shared here would be a terrible blow to the candlepower of consciousness, extending far beyond this platform. If you decamp, please consider letting the gift of your slipstream, be.Quoted by@pauljpastor Well said, Paul. You dunk in the creek each morn. I climb a hill with the dog to sit and breathe well here a while.Quoted by@AimeTim Tim, though you now turn elsewhere, your Twitter slipstream still constitutes a pivotal, ongoing contribution to the larger, collective, planetary adventure in consciousness. Even as your focus shifts, please keep that vast treasure-house of wisdom alive among us. Love ya, truly.