Nick Routledge@nick_routledge
Reply to @nick_routledge

@RDGStout end/ Yes, there's also the Logos. The Truth Power Itself (Heb 4:12, Eph 6:17, Rev 19:15, Isa 11:4, 2 Thess 2:8). And the New World Creation whereof the Gospel speaks? It sounds through the mercy, militant, of the Word; and the Empire succumbing to the fires of its own Speech Act.

Copy of tweet , image and quote tweet here:
Image description

Original X alt text

Copy of tweet , image and quote tweet here:

Extended description

Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge quoting Alyosha Karamazov and Jeremiah Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: Alyosha Source: archive.nickroutledge.org/post/1851667688634085486 Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. @BrianZahnd Alyosha Karamazov: “We are all responsible for everyone else - but I am more responsible than all the others.’’ Where Jeremiah was appointed “a prophet to the nations”, who, these days, is projecting prophetic radicalism upon a universal, trans-cultural, world-historical plane? t.co/q0MNlbzNTU t.co/VXFjzKJMgx

Open original document

Extended description

Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge quoting Walter Brueggemann in three posts Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: Thread 1 / We are / but reluctant Source: Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. Copy of thread here: Thread 1/ #WalterBrueggemann's 'The Practice of Prophetic Imagination’: “Prophetic preaching does not put people in crisis. Rather it names and makes palpable the crisis already pulsing among us...” “We are, for the most part, double-minded. There is hidden deep within most of us, I suspect, a profound tension between these narratives, knowing better than to trust the dominant narrative but having a huge stake in its being true, wanting the gospel narrative to be true...” “but reluctant to speak another language about the world other than the one in which we are palpably invested. It is the hard work of prophetic preaching, I propose, to make that tension explicit, available & visible, in order to permit informed, knowing choices.” - Brueggemann

Open original document

Extended description

Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: end As such Source: archive.nickroutledge.org/post/1851667688634085486 Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. @ShaneClaiborne end/ As such, in eschatologically-inclusive Islamo-Judeo-Christian terms, the Palestinian Event defines a cosmic threshold severing truth from falsehood, wheat from tares, and the new world creation from an Extinction Tyranny’s ‘final crisis.’ So shall evil be destroyed. t.co/2wh3OkYHFd t.co/xC5oLxzDBB

Open original document

Quoted or linked post

Nick Routledge@nick_routledge · 21 Sept 2024

@MarietjeSchaake @mer__edith "There isn’t a business model for privacy on the internet." - @mer__edith. Models, I ask ya. How about a Model of Reality ultimately constituting the Pseudo-Event's irrevocable, surveillance-encounter with Truth itself?

Copy of tweet here:

5/ Some three decades ago, I concluded that battling the forces of digital surveillance would condemn me to a life of lost, endless war against the irresistible dynamics and direction of evolutionary ontology itself. What instead, then? What nature a coherent, personal response?

2/ What about a more generous evolutionary perspective? I co-hosted a Congressional Briefing on Computer Ethics in DC, back in the early 90's. Where my co-chair, Dr. Peter Tippett, then of Symantec, went on to consult to the Joint Chiefs of Staff on cyberwarfare, I arrived here.
Image description

Original X alt text

Copy of tweet here: 5/ Some three decades ago, I concluded that battling the forces of digital surveillance would condemn me to a life of lost, endless war against the irresistible dynamics and direction of evolutionary ontology itself. What instead, then? What nature a coherent, personal response? 2/ What about a more generous evolutionary perspective? I co-hosted a Congressional Briefing on Computer Ethics in DC, back in the early 90's. Where my co-chair, Dr. Peter Tippett, then of Symantec, went on to consult to the Joint Chiefs of Staff on cyberwarfare, I arrived here.

Copy of tweet here:

1/2 Simultaneously, paralleling its colossal impetus, cloud imperialism's consolidation within and dependence upon an all-aggregating machine-abstraction, reveals the entire ontological edifice as, correspondingly, vastly more ephemeral and exposed than its engineers conceive.

McLuhan was very fond of the phrase, "the Prince of this world, Satan, is a very great electrical engineer." And tailor to Emperors, too. The cyberspatial conglomeration of evil? A cosmic design feature, not a flaw, making it addressable, ultimately, in one fell swoop. 1 John 3:8

Technology is too often used as a stealth vector (often by private actors who control the tech) to enact, embody, or constitute quintessentially “political” matters — that is, matters concerning the allocation & legitimation of power & authority.   AI puts this pattern on steroids

Goes both ways. Long before the Web, planetary Sages anticipated…
Image description

Original X alt text

Copy of tweet here: 1/2 Simultaneously, paralleling its colossal impetus, cloud imperialism's consolidation within and dependence upon an all-aggregating machine-abstraction, reveals the entire ontological edifice as, correspondingly, vastly more ephemeral and exposed than its engineers conceive. McLuhan was very fond of the phrase, "the Prince of this world, Satan, is a very great electrical engineer." And tailor to Emperors, too. The cyberspatial conglomeration of evil? A cosmic design feature, not a flaw, making it addressable, ultimately, in one fell swoop. 1 John 3:8 Technology is too often used as a stealth vector (often by private actors who control the tech) to enact, embody, or constitute quintessentially “political” matters — that is, matters concerning the allocation & legitimation of power & authority. AI puts this pattern on steroids Goes both ways. Long before the Web, planetary Sages anticipated…

View this post’s context →