Nick Routledge@nick_routledge
Reply to @brianmclaren

@brianmclaren Matthew Fox got me started. And yet, there comes a time, for the sake of all, where the pragmatic reconciliation of 'religion' and 'mysticism' occurs, in God's time, as an advent of wholeness made possible (only) by the supersession of the messianic. ?s=20

Copy of tweet:

Nick Routledge
In essence, prophetic earthwork endeavors to give a local face to the unifying articulation of the Messianic Event, by somatically embodying a realm of perception and liberating activity which simply transcends the fierce contradictions and dualisms of our time.

With art and calligraphy reading, "The colors of the grove and voices of the birds will restore immortality at the time when we shall come into the garden, thou and I. - Rumi"
Image description

Original X alt text

Copy of tweet: Nick Routledge In essence, prophetic earthwork endeavors to give a local face to the unifying articulation of the Messianic Event, by somatically embodying a realm of perception and liberating activity which simply transcends the fierce contradictions and dualisms of our time. With art and calligraphy reading, "The colors of the grove and voices of the birds will restore immortality at the time when we shall come into the garden, thou and I. - Rumi"

Quoted or linked post

Nick Routledge@nick_routledge · 21 Dec 2023

@SherPoint 7/ Such reconciliation embraces way more than mysticism and religion, of course. It welcomes everything: the visible and invisible, secular and sacred, natural and manufactured, human and more-than-human, in a summation completing itself in the power and promise of wholeness.

Copy of tweet here:

Indeed, why eschew a syncretic secular-religious concatenation, when a mature synthesis advances an evolutionary perspective transcending the agency of either camp, alone? What if a coherent planetary response is accessible to us only because it is inherently reconciliatory?
Image description

Original X alt text

Copy of tweet here: Indeed, why eschew a syncretic secular-religious concatenation, when a mature synthesis advances an evolutionary perspective transcending the agency of either camp, alone? What if a coherent planetary response is accessible to us only because it is inherently reconciliatory?

View this post’s context →

Context in the archive

Quoted byRT @nick_routledge: @pauljpastor end/ Frankly, I don’t see why awakening can’t be both/either, religious/mystical, gradual/sudden, efforted/spontaneous, solo/corporate. Besides, what if both complements are finally necessary? What, indeed, of the irrevocable wakeup of the planetary sunburst of the Second Advent?Quoted by@pauljpastor end/ Frankly, I don’t see why awakening can’t be both/either, religious/mystical, gradual/sudden, efforted/spontaneous, solo/corporate. Besides, what if both complements are finally necessary? What, indeed, of the irrevocable wakeup of the planetary sunburst of the Second Advent?