Nick Routledge@nick_routledge
Repost

RT @nick_routledge: @RasooolAkbari @jbralston On holistic experience, essentially Thomistic 'intuition of being', Richard Rohr: "Ideas are not a problem, but a true inner experience is something else: “full-access knowing”—prerational, nonrational, rational, and transrational all at once. [It] refuses to be reductionistic.”

Quoted or linked post

Nick Routledge@nick_routledge · 4 Dec 2022

@CACRadicalGrace @RichardRohrOFM Indeed, the identical heresy of the scientific method or, as Thomas Berry encapsulates it, the "downward reductionism of the mechanists and the upward reductionism of the spiritualists.” No wonder the call for a New Reformation. A New Reconcilation, then? ?s=20&t=jygN9r6anfFtNTRziHKfyA

Copy of quote tweet:

Nick Routledge
3/ But what if lived experience of the One Life isn’t actually a form of distance-learning? What if the minute particulars of life represent the immediate, transcendent ground of the overarching veracity of a vast, mostly unseen, singular, energy event?
Quote Tweet
Nick Routledge
·
...reveals the universe not to be a collection of objects but, as #PaulDavies puts it, "an inseparable web of complicated energy patterns in which no one component has reality independently of the entirety; and included in the entirety is the observer." - Quantitative Romanticism
12:59 PM · Jun 16, 2021
Image description

Original X alt text

Copy of quote tweet: Nick Routledge 3/ But what if lived experience of the One Life isn’t actually a form of distance-learning? What if the minute particulars of life represent the immediate, transcendent ground of the overarching veracity of a vast, mostly unseen, singular, energy event? Quote Tweet Nick Routledge · ...reveals the universe not to be a collection of objects but, as #PaulDavies puts it, "an inseparable web of complicated energy patterns in which no one component has reality independently of the entirety; and included in the entirety is the observer." - Quantitative Romanticism 12:59 PM · Jun 16, 2021

View this post’s context →

Context in the archive

Quoted byRT @nick_routledge: @ThinkingFaith Wonderful. In the light of a comedic paradox whereby 'both sides look at the same data, give the same odds, draw the same conclusions, then go in completely different directions', I wonder also if the most comprehensible part about the universe is that it cannot be comprehended.Quoted by@ThinkingFaith Wonderful. In the light of a comedic paradox whereby 'both sides look at the same data, give the same odds, draw the same conclusions, then go in completely different directions', I wonder also if the most comprehensible part about the universe is that it cannot be comprehended.Quoted byRT @nick_routledge: @Rishardtrading @EsmeLKPartridge Werner Heisenberg: "Only a few know, how much one must know to know how little one knows." Mark Epstein: "What I had learned from Buddhism was that I did not have to know myself analytically as much as I had to tolerate not knowing."Quoted by@Rishardtrading @EsmeLKPartridge Werner Heisenberg: "Only a few know, how much one must know to know how little one knows." Mark Epstein: "What I had learned from Buddhism was that I did not have to know myself analytically as much as I had to tolerate not knowing."Quoted by@PhoebeTickell That's elegant. End departmental conflict! Speaking of which, how are you, dearest heart? Still up to your holistically-inclined endeavors, I take it? ?s=20