Nick Routledge@nick_routledge
Repost

RT @nick_routledge: @Rishardtrading @EsmeLKPartridge Werner Heisenberg: "Only a few know, how much one must know to know how little one knows." Mark Epstein: "What I had learned from Buddhism was that I did not have to know myself analytically as much as I had to tolerate not knowing."

Copy of tweet:

7/ "...The great equalizers dispensed by the scientific method are the tools, those analytical tools. The miracle of genius is replaced by the standardization mechanism. But fools with tools are still fools, and don't let your Phi Beta Kappa key fool you."
Image description

Original X alt text

Copy of tweet: 7/ "...The great equalizers dispensed by the scientific method are the tools, those analytical tools. The miracle of genius is replaced by the standardization mechanism. But fools with tools are still fools, and don't let your Phi Beta Kappa key fool you."

Copy of tweet:

"The major heresy of the Western churches is that they have largely turned the very meaning of faith into its exact opposite. True faith involves not knowing and even not needing to know, but we made faith demanding to know and insisting that we do know!" @RichardRohrOFM
Image description

Original X alt text

Copy of tweet: "The major heresy of the Western churches is that they have largely turned the very meaning of faith into its exact opposite. True faith involves not knowing and even not needing to know, but we made faith demanding to know and insisting that we do know!" @RichardRohrOFM

Quoted or linked post

Nick Routledge@nick_routledge · 29 Mar 2023

@RasooolAkbari @jbralston On holistic experience, essentially Thomistic 'intuition of being', Richard Rohr: "Ideas are not a problem, but a true inner experience is something else: “full-access knowing”—prerational, nonrational, rational, and transrational all at once. [It] refuses to be reductionistic.”

View this post’s context →

Context in the archive

Quoted by@lukeburgis Well stated. I'm consistently astonished by how little I know (isn't that the redemptive dimension of epiphanic experience?) and by how much my integrity depends on sharing with that in mind. Illich would perhaps aver humility the experiential substrate of messianic experience.Quoted by@SherPoint 2/ If not unity, what do we 'see' then? As a rule, an identification with the distinctions and divisions of materialist and religious logic; the forms, concepts, rationalizations and, ultimately, caricatures of reality co-existent with fallacies of ontological detachment.