@NoemaMag @macariomx The sharper possibility is that the new transcendent framework is neither generated autonomously by the network nor imposed upon it, but born through the convergence of the Cloud's emergent planetary consciousness and a reality exceeding what the medium can even represent.
Image description
Original X alt text
4/ The deeper blindness is the AI mindset, the techno-industrial complex it both serves and crowns, and its incapacity to see what it most needs to see—vast realms of consciousness, culture, and the natural world that precede and exceed it. What is most real is not a data type. Subtweets: Every technology eventually forces two questions: what kind of humans are we becoming—and what do we believe truly matters? Ultimately, its deepest significance isn't what it does, but what it reveals: our desires, the limits of our stories, the orders we take for granted. As for science itself? AI is landing as a supercharged accelerant of scientific discovery, yet its deeper impact may well be meta-scientific: revealing what science can't see—how thin our materialist accounts of mind, conscience, meaning, and the story of reality actually are.
A new infrastructure now organizes consciousness, opening upon novel conditions through which planetary meaning newly constitutes itself—not gloss on meaning but a new revelatory form. This is noetic inquiry in its native element: the digital environment as eschatological plenum.
Image description
Original X alt text
Copy of tweet here: Depends what you're about. Even if its positive evolutionary significance remains largely unrecognized, no other platform weds to the peculiar ontological promise of internetworked hypertext as does Twitter. Some get it. Most don't.