
RT @nick_routledge: @JMGreerWriter @unherd An interesting inversion suggests itself. The proliferation of apocalypticism may not signal an excess of apocalypse but a shortage of it. When genuine unveiling (apocalypsis) is eclipsed, vernacular, end-times simulacra rush in to fill the void. A thread on that distinction. ↓

@profntwright 1/6 A distinction worth recovering: apocalypse and apocalypticism are not the same thing. Apocalypse is revelation: reality disclosed as it really is. Apocalypticism mistakes a popularized 'end-times' reading of history for reality itself.

Image description
Original X alt text
Something is breaking. The question is whether we’re reckoning with an actualized apocalypse—reality disclosing its own structure under pressure—or fleeing it into apocalypticism—a cartoon narrative, crude and ersatz. One reveals the Real; the other, a phantasmic confection.