Nick Routledge@nick_routledge
Reply to @TaraAnnThieke

@TaraAnnThieke As for science itself? AI is landing as a supercharged accelerant of scientific discovery, yet its deeper impact may well be meta-scientific: revealing what science can't see—how thin our materialist accounts of mind, conscience, meaning, and the story of reality actually are.

Quoted or linked post

Nick Routledge@nick_routledge · 4 Feb 2026

@being_on_line @bratton 1/11 The essay builds a high balcony over the discourse. But that vantage rests on @NoemaMag’s default frame: metaphysical naturalism as the non-ideological baseline—fixing the debate’s boundary conditions so paradigmatic alternatives read as ‘psychological’ and ‘non-serious’.

View this post’s context →

Context in the archive

Quoted byRT @nick_routledge: @riyeff Every technology eventually forces two questions: what kind of humans are we becoming—and what do we believe truly matters? Ultimately, its deepest significance isn't what it does, but what it reveals: our desires, the limits of our stories, the orders we take for granted.Quoted by@riyeff Every technology eventually forces two questions: what kind of humans are we becoming—and what do we believe truly matters? Ultimately, its deepest significance isn't what it does, but what it reveals: our desires, the limits of our stories, the orders we take for granted.