Nick Routledge@nick_routledge
Reply to @tenshi_anna

@tenshi_anna @RyanHaecker A thoughtful list—thank you. I wonder, though, if its pattern reveals not just an historical omission but an epistemic and constitutive bias—perhaps even quietly docetic: theology that begins at a remove from the flesh of the world, unlike, say, Keller, Delio, Deane-Drummond…

Quoted or linked post

Nick Routledge@nick_routledge · 24 Aug 2025

end/ Incarnation is not metaphor but embodied apocalypse: history’s judgment and creation’s rebirth. This is the eschaton: love blazing through soil and species, body and polis, networks and nations—our own flesh and the flesh of the world, revealed as the medium of divine law.

Copy of tweet and image here:

3/[edit]

I suggest that deep incarnation can be understood, theologically, to act at the boundary of creation and new creation, where Christ enters into human, evolutionary and ecological history in a profound way so that through the living presence of the Holy Spirit...deep incarnation should be understood not so much as the spatial descent of God into creation, or even the ontological extension of Christ into creation, but most profoundly as the transformative and dramatic movement of God in Christ, who takes centre stage in the theo-drama...accompanied by the active presence of the Holy Spirit, so that deep incarnation can be envisaged as an aspect of pneumatology as much as of Christology, an eschatological vision of glory. Here we find pneumatology in the space between creation and re-creation, in the creation as it is now and in the promised eschatological hope where God will be all in all.
Image description

Original X alt text

Copy of tweet and image here: 3/[edit] I suggest that deep incarnation can be understood, theologically, to act at the boundary of creation and new creation, where Christ enters into human, evolutionary and ecological history in a profound way so that through the living presence of the Holy Spirit...deep incarnation should be understood not so much as the spatial descent of God into creation, or even the ontological extension of Christ into creation, but most profoundly as the transformative and dramatic movement of God in Christ, who takes centre stage in the theo-drama...accompanied by the active presence of the Holy Spirit, so that deep incarnation can be envisaged as an aspect of pneumatology as much as of Christology, an eschatological vision of glory. Here we find pneumatology in the space between creation and re-creation, in the creation as it is now and in the promised eschatological hope where God will be all in all.

View this post’s context →

Context in the archive

Quoted by@HaddenTurner @affinitytalks 23/ Milk flowing, bees thriving: these aren't symbols of the Kingdom accomplished elsewhere. They're redemption's very texture, arriving here, through hands that have learned the difference between mastery and midwifery, between building Babel and planting Eden forward into time.Quoted by@MutualSociology 2/ Jewish and Christian currents converged here around a common eschatological assent: the world-as-it-is stands under the claim of a world-to-come already pressing in, and that claim must be embodied, not merely believed.Quoted byWalking the faithful hound today, I'm stumbled upon a $2 copy of Celia Deane-Drummond—democracy of grace shelved between discarded romance and self-help, the Logos wandering thrift bins as freely as galaxies. Checkmate, disembodied theology. Thanking God for Godless booksellers.