@moshik_temkin Woulda, shoulda, coulda. Besides, many actually saw it for what it truly was and is. More people stayed home than voted for either candidate.
@nils_gilman @infopank 'Genocide tolerator'? @Calcalistech estimates the Administration has funded roughly 70% of Israel's war costs since Oct 7. The election offered us what? Listen. In terms of planetary reality, a demonic complex. Or do you have it that radical evil is a realistic political choice?
Image description
Original X alt text
Copy of tweet here:
Extended description
Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge quoting Twain as pictured Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: Thank you dear man Source: Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. @sentantiq Thank you, dear man. I'm reminded of Twain's, "You don't get the government you want: you get the government you deserve," and, ultimately, of course, the comeuppance of a Reckoning Day.
Open original documentExtended description
Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: An honest question Source: Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. @RevDrBarber An honest question. What if more folk staying home than voting for either candidate amounted to an authentic win for a fundamental shift in approach? Why bet on the losing horse in a one horse race, after all? Or do you have it that radical evil is a realistic Christian choice? t.co/QCp5Qh4fVm
Open original documentExtended description
Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: What next then Source: archive.nickroutledge.org/post/1853877915546702077 Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. @UssamaMakdisi What next, then? Planetary prophetology's unifying articulation names it: the surge of a crowning planetary authority revealing a realm and reign of truth transcending the mimetic crisis of chronically malignant fictions and fabrications sustaining the whole, aggregate shitshow. t.co/aI7XKvklKU
Open original documentExtended description
Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: What next then Source: Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. @UssamaMakdisi What next, then? Planetary prophetology's unifying articulation names it: the surge of a crowning planetary authority revealing a realm and reign of truth transcending the mimetic crisis of chronically malignant fictions and fabrications sustaining the whole, aggregate shitshow. t.co/aI7XKvklKU
Open original documentExtended description
Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: If rude facts Source: Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. @RNS @NWirzba If rude facts hereabouts hold a lesson, it's likely the truth, sharp as a dentist's probe, that 'just vote' is liberal for 'thoughts and prayers' and, similarly, that hopeful religion and political science are core drivers of, as distinct from solutions to, the global polycrisis. t.co/jkoH7TWPiI
Open original document