@AimeTim 1/2 Dan Castillo is most valuable in clarifying how Francis’ concept of integral ecology “maps onto the levels of liberation delineated by Gutiérrez, while expanding the breadth of concern proper to integral liberation by also encompassing a preferential option for the earth.”
Image description
Original X alt text
Copy of tweet here: We must go further. As such, the advent of the 'prophetic earthwork' movement as a bio-composite communion or convivium of land-based service work. To recalibrate or reintegrate Illich: “The kingdom is an eco-social reality at a transcendental level." I suspect geologian Thomas Berry would paint that as a classic case of 'anthropocentric autism' - a religious compass thoroughly divorced from grounding in Nature's harmony, proportions, integrity and, yes, concretized Christification. Faith profoundly unhinged. Xianity lite. Castillo: "Integral liberation cannot be separated from the process of integral communion." Ellen Davis: "The threefold communion with God, neighbor, and earth properly constitutes Christified space." We are called, in other words, to the salvation of "an ecological conversion."
Image description
Original X alt text
Cover of Daniel P. Castillo’s ‘An Ecological Theology of Liberation: Salvation and Political Ecology. Forward by Gustavo Gutiérrez
@HaddenTurner Hence, the anthropogenic dynamism of New World Creation - the deep ecology of peacemaking effecting and requiring an integral, intra-realm response to a symbiotic eco-cultural challenge. Jim Wallis: "Jesus didn’t say, “Blessed are the peace-lovers.” He said, “peace-makers".
View this post’s context →