Nick Routledge@nick_routledge
Reply to @artofmanliness

@artofmanliness @lukeburgis I respectfully beg to differ! 😀 Raimon Panikkar's 'The Cosmotheandric Experience' propels the footnote into what feels almost like an entirely new theological category. There's a tangible joy to footnote fanhood most seem to miss, isn't there? The sublime, buried in a field.

Finally, there is the matter of all those footnotes! In some cases, these
rather thoroughgoing explicitations of context nearly squeeze the text right
off the page. The modern reader may find all this scholarly scrupulosity a
little taxing, but look a bit closer and you'll see that the text itself is, so to
speak, cleared by this maneuver, smoothed out and streamlined — one might even say modernized —by consigning most of the references to the subtext. Yet they remain very much in evidence, for those who would dig deeper. If there is one annoying colloquialism that recurs in many of Panikkar’s writings, it is his seemingly quaint—and perhaps characteristically Catalan — insistence on never "throwing out the baby with the bathwater.”
Image description

Original X alt text

Finally, there is the matter of all those footnotes! In some cases, these rather thoroughgoing explicitations of context nearly squeeze the text right off the page. The modern reader may find all this scholarly scrupulosity a little taxing, but look a bit closer and you'll see that the text itself is, so to speak, cleared by this maneuver, smoothed out and streamlined — one might even say modernized —by consigning most of the references to the subtext. Yet they remain very much in evidence, for those who would dig deeper. If there is one annoying colloquialism that recurs in many of Panikkar’s writings, it is his seemingly quaint—and perhaps characteristically Catalan — insistence on never "throwing out the baby with the bathwater.”

Quoted or linked post

Nick Routledge@nick_routledge · 29 Jan 2024

Hah! A Classics education proves its point. Happy to note a typo in the notes to Raimon Panikkar's 'The Cosmotheandric Experience' referring to Aquinas' 'Summa Theologiae I', which should properly read, "...unicum Verbum eius est expressivum non solum patris..." #ClassicsTwitter

207. Cf. D. Thomas: “Deus enim cognoscendo se, cognoscit omnem creaturam... Sed quia Deus uno actu et se et omnia intelligit, unicum Verbum eius est espressivum solum Patris, sed etiam creaturam.” Sum. theol. 1, g. 34, a. 3, c. (cf. also Ps. 39, 3 ff.).
Image description

Original X alt text

207. Cf. D. Thomas: “Deus enim cognoscendo se, cognoscit omnem creaturam... Sed quia Deus uno actu et se et omnia intelligit, unicum Verbum eius est espressivum solum Patris, sed etiam creaturam.” Sum. theol. 1, g. 34, a. 3, c. (cf. also Ps. 39, 3 ff.).

View this post’s context →

Context in the archive

Quoted by@sentantiq The joke writes itself. Panikkar didn't use footnotes to support text: he used text to justify footnote excursions. Greek etymological asides pivot to Sanskrit gloss looping through Heideggerian parentheses, emerging 3 pages later with a 2nd more interesting text beneath the 1st.