Nick Routledge@nick_routledge
Reply

@Tao_Orion In other words, 'power-differentials' matter not a whit when no less than evolutionary ontology itself settles terms between an essentially artificial compass, and one inhabiting the truth of the Real; between an economic-transactional reality, and ecological-relational living.

Copy of tweet and quote tweet here: ‘Rich’ and ‘poor’? Constructs distinguishing a ‘transactional’ or ‘quid quo pro’ (as distinct from ‘transformational’) stance with regard to experience and reality; the former pointing at a personal and corporate hell-realm of disassociation, alienation and inescapable Reckoning. Quote tweet: You're not alone. No matter their era or area of origin, planetary prophets universally identify moneytheism and its full-spectrum dominance over the moral and ontological imagination, as ‘The Big Lie that economic logic is the only model that will work.’ - Shoshana Zuboff
Image description

Original X alt text

Copy of tweet and quote tweet here: ‘Rich’ and ‘poor’? Constructs distinguishing a ‘transactional’ or ‘quid quo pro’ (as distinct from ‘transformational’) stance with regard to experience and reality; the former pointing at a personal and corporate hell-realm of disassociation, alienation and inescapable Reckoning. Quote tweet: You're not alone. No matter their era or area of origin, planetary prophets universally identify moneytheism and its full-spectrum dominance over the moral and ontological imagination, as ‘The Big Lie that economic logic is the only model that will work.’ - Shoshana Zuboff

Quoted or linked post

Nick Routledge@nick_routledge · 10 Aug 2023

@nils_gilman Terrific. Perhaps also worth noting that whereas legacy forms of significance typically dismiss 'neighborly eco-social reality' as a defining, co-evolutionary pivot-point for personal and world transformation, it nonetheless remains our primary, bio-cultural 'space for agency'.

View this post’s context →

Context in the archive

Quoted by@RizomaSchool end\ The eschatological reversal the Messiah promised isn’t metaphor. The poor inherit the Kingdom because what they have lived all along stands revealed as the ontology it requires. What seemed loss is the template for the New Creation coming into being. The last are now first.Quoted byRT @nick_routledge: @sentantiq Fascinating. Thank you, Joel. Fwiw, I suspect no scholar may be as comprehensively acknowledged as wedding philosophy and mysticism more fully and deftly than the great integrator and 5th Century mujaddid, Al-Ghazali: "You possess only whatever will not be lost in a shipwreck.”Quoted by@sentantiq Fascinating. Thank you, Joel. Fwiw, I suspect no scholar may be as comprehensively acknowledged as wedding philosophy and mysticism more fully and deftly than the great integrator and 5th Century mujaddid, Al-Ghazali: "You possess only whatever will not be lost in a shipwreck.”Quoted by@nils_gilman @bratton end/ And on the other, we return to the home field organizational advantage of a functional, coherent paradigmatic alternative to legacy structures of consciousness and power, and immense ontological pastures of ecological and cultural promise and possibility so far denied us.Quoted byRT @AgrarianSharing: Panikkar: "Human beings now hold in their hands the fate of all life on the planet, investing the problem of peace with cosmic proportions.. interrogating the very foundations of culture, the very ends of life and reality. This is the novelty and difficulty of peace in our days."Quoted byPanikkar: "Human beings now hold in their hands the fate of all life on the planet, investing the problem of peace with cosmic proportions.. interrogating the very foundations of culture, the very ends of life and reality. This is the novelty and difficulty of peace in our days."