Nick Routledge@nick_routledge
Reply to @umairh

@umairh Not exactly. "The cascade of accumulating differences that in chaos dynamical theory leads to a new catastrophe bifurcation" (William Irwin Thompson) can also be interpreted 'apocalyptically', that is, in a propitious, revelatory light transcending its narrow, literal meaning.

Copy of tweet here:
Image description

Original X alt text

Copy of tweet here:

Extended description

Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: Our prophets universally Source: Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. @UssamaMakdisi Our prophets universally depict this momentous revelation of the monstrous, wholesale moral destitution of our primary, international 'superpowers', as the rending of a well-wrought veil of deceit, a historical bifurcation point defining a providential, planetary dividing line. t.co/d7nQzH0V2E

Open original document

Extended description

Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: Folks might also Source: Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. @mehdirhasan Folks might also not be aware the Cycle of Unveiling or 'dawr al-kashf' of the Shi'ite Hidden Imam or 'qāʾim', correlates precisely with Judeo-Christian interpretation of the 'apocalypsis' or unveiling of 'the sunburst of the messianic'. And why ever would it not? t.co/WfT9pUEVol

Open original document

Extended description

Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: An astute anticipated Source: Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. @medialens An astute, anticipated distinction. The original meaning of ‘apocalypsis’? Unveiling. A 'Day' or 'Hour' of vision, decision and liberating experience in which legacy forms of authority, credibility, legitimacy and agency are espistemically demolished by the force of truth itself. t.co/s3GVTcKZ2N

Open original document

Extended description

Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: To see is Source: Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. Copy of tweet: To see is to see through. Realpolitik, the keeper of the prison, which commands us to be fooled by appearances, to respect the Emperor's New Clothes. The blindness is from the blinkers of decorum. ‘Apocalypsis’ strips away the decent draperies on which the whole big lie depends.

Open original document

Quoted or linked post

Nick Routledge@nick_routledge · 22 Nov 2023

@SophiaCycles "Sustaining the ambiguity preceding a new experience of meaning"? A mandate *exact* to this epochal moment as we, together, advance through "the chaos taking place in our [world] neurosis, the only home ground that we can build the mandala of [planetary] awakening on." - Trungpa

Copy of tweet:

and 6 others
An intensification of consciousness, yes. And may we have the wisdom to appreciate its necessity as an index of our need for transformation and the fierceness of the fire required to prise us from the falsehoods which have for so long sustained our crippling self-definition.
Image description

Original X alt text

Copy of tweet: and 6 others An intensification of consciousness, yes. And may we have the wisdom to appreciate its necessity as an index of our need for transformation and the fierceness of the fire required to prise us from the falsehoods which have for so long sustained our crippling self-definition.

View this post’s context →

Context in the archive

Quoted byRT @nick_routledge: @faustroll @nyctherapist Well, yes and no. What this is not, is an interminable slog toward a dead end; rather, the disarray necessarily defining a phase shift of evolutionary proportions as one planetary paradigm crashes and another replaces it. Meade: “Welcome to the end of the world as we knew it.”Quoted by@faustroll @nyctherapist Well, yes and no. What this is not, is an interminable slog toward a dead end; rather, the disarray necessarily defining a phase shift of evolutionary proportions as one planetary paradigm crashes and another replaces it. Meade: “Welcome to the end of the world as we knew it.”