Nick Routledge@nick_routledge
Reply to @nick_routledge

@AimeTim end/ His concern, he said, not religion, but its anthropology and, as such, the staggering features of Jesus' murder ultimately revealing the only way out of a revolving hall of projections - our "automatic, unconscious, ingrained and mimetic" escalating war of all against all.

Tweet and quote tweet here:

"Conscious people do not scapegoat; unconscious people do almost nothing else."
    ~ @RichardRohrOFM

“We have to discover our shadow. Otherwise we are driven into a world war in order to see what beasts we are."
    ~ C.G. Jung

Quote tweet:

Hence, Jung: “The best political, social, and spiritual work we can do is to withdraw the projection of our own shadow onto others.” And Richo: “The goal of an evolved consciousness is to take its projections back.”
Image description

Original X alt text

Tweet and quote tweet here: "Conscious people do not scapegoat; unconscious people do almost nothing else." ~ @RichardRohrOFM “We have to discover our shadow. Otherwise we are driven into a world war in order to see what beasts we are." ~ C.G. Jung Quote tweet: Hence, Jung: “The best political, social, and spiritual work we can do is to withdraw the projection of our own shadow onto others.” And Richo: “The goal of an evolved consciousness is to take its projections back.”

Quoted or linked post

Nick Routledge@nick_routledge · 21 Jul 2023

@jmrphy 'Looks'? Overlooked. Bailie: "..an act of official violence regarded as legally righteous by the political authorities and as a sacred duty by the religionists. This simple and obvious fact is the most overlooked aspect of the colossal historical phenomenon we call Christianity."

The murder of Jesus, viewed as a sacred duty by the religios and legally righteous by the pols, reveals the perverse, foundational complicity between cultural status quo and the  scapegoat function, declaring the absolute centrality of the position of the Victim.
In the final analysis, denying the truth of the Victim has screened us from ‘apocalypsis’, the unveiling of a realm of perception and liberating experience in which the common lie of dominative materialist and religious denial is unmasked, and the Great Lover revealed.
It has taken until now to realize the staggering anthropological and co-evolutionary significance of the Cross because the moral, intellectual, and epistemological effects of the Gospel revelation have of necessity developed gradually.
Last words, from Rene Girard: “..beyond all that disfigures it in our eyes, the truth of the victim that we at last possess is the greatest, most fortunate event in the history of religion and the whole of humanity.” @unitethepoor
Image description

Original X alt text

The murder of Jesus, viewed as a sacred duty by the religios and legally righteous by the pols, reveals the perverse, foundational complicity between cultural status quo and the scapegoat function, declaring the absolute centrality of the position of the Victim. In the final analysis, denying the truth of the Victim has screened us from ‘apocalypsis’, the unveiling of a realm of perception and liberating experience in which the common lie of dominative materialist and religious denial is unmasked, and the Great Lover revealed. It has taken until now to realize the staggering anthropological and co-evolutionary significance of the Cross because the moral, intellectual, and epistemological effects of the Gospel revelation have of necessity developed gradually. Last words, from Rene Girard: “..beyond all that disfigures it in our eyes, the truth of the victim that we at last possess is the greatest, most fortunate event in the history of religion and the whole of humanity.” @unitethepoor

View this post’s context →

Context in the archive

Quoted byRT @nick_routledge: @suzania On “bringing the importance of the narrative dimensions of the cross into greater clarity”, I recall 'Violence Unveiled', @gbailie's reflection on Girard. Both men recognize the Crucifixion's theological claim becomes intelligible only _after_ it is recognized anthropologically.Quoted by@suzania On “bringing the importance of the narrative dimensions of the cross into greater clarity”, I recall 'Violence Unveiled', @gbailie's reflection on Girard. Both men recognize the Crucifixion's theological claim becomes intelligible only _after_ it is recognized anthropologically.Quoted by@jonmsweeney Girard has conclusive insight to offer on our condition and, furthermore, the crowning authority of the Cross in overcoming the essential complicity between cultures, religion and violence.Quoted by@BrianZahnd @BKristofferson Great question, Brett. Dispensing with religion-speak: the peacemaking power of the Crucifixion issues from its crowning authority overcoming the complicity between cultures, religions and violence. Simply put, the Prince of Peace ultimately overcomes Christian religion itself.