Nick Routledge@nick_routledge
Reply to @LondonFfP

@LondonFfP @Bin_Bayyah Curious if a US presence was represented at your convivium? Its IT sages, on this trail for a while, are keenly alert to the threats and promise posed by ongoing, evolving trends in computer-mediated experience, and their larger, planetary, theo-political implications.

Copy of tweet thread beginning here:
Image description

Original X alt text

Copy of tweet thread beginning here:

Extended description

Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge quoting Kevin Kelly in two bodies Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: 3 Here's Kevin / People who work Source: Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. Copy of tweet here: 3/ Here's Kevin Kelly, for example, widely recognized as one of the world's most insightful technology philosophers. "We were once the People of the Book. But today, with more than five billion digital screens, we are now the People of the Screen." Quote Tweet: Nick Routledge “People who work with computers have an evolving sense of godhead that is different from the ideas of non-nerds.” @kevin2kelly

Open original document

Extended description

Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: 4 Kevin's Source: Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. @franxstrax @MassimoFaggioli 4/ Kevin’s was one of first voices alluding to the sacerdotal implications of information technology, the larger significance of a seismic evolutionary shift in which billions of hearts and minds are now inter-connected in one, common, electronic universe.

Open original document

Extended description

Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge quoting Teilhard de Chardin in nested post Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: 5 Meanwhile / Cosmos > Cosmogenesis Source: Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. Quote tweet: Nick Routledge · and 5/ Meanwhile, the reality-shifting implications of this planetary concatenation of consciousness have long been anticipated. Teilhard de Chardin's final diary entry in 1955, alluded specifically to the central place of the noosphere in Christic evolution: Quote Tweet Nick Routledge · “Cosmos > Cosmogenesis > Biogenesis > Noogenesis > Christogenesis” – Teilhard de Chardin.

Open original document

Extended description

Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: 6 How might Source: Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. @franxstrax @MassimoFaggioli 6/ How might we interpret this phenomenon theologically? What is the inter-spiritual vision of revelation now emerging through a technology finally making possible a truly global gathering, synthesis, integration and summation of the multiplicity of revelations?

Open original document

Quoted or linked post

Nick Routledge@nick_routledge · 5 Jul 2023

@paologranata Paolo, hello. Curious if you can point to a hermaneutic illuminating AI in specifically McLuhanesque terms? "I think we're now ready for the breakthrough that McLuhan lived his life waiting for." - Mark Stahlman, Center for the Study of Digital Life (youtu.be/oPP1J37i2Bk?t=1022)

Copy of tweet thread beginning here:
Image description

Original X alt text

Copy of tweet thread beginning here:

Extended description

Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Massimo Faggioli @MassimoFaggioli, May15 Recovered pictured passage; not a claim to the full source. Passage boundary: Source: archive.nickroutledge.org/post/1676684372131614720 Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. these masters of the universe are the new cardinal Bellarmine

Open original document

Extended description

Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: Massimo can't recall / end If AI-enhanced Source: Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. Copy of tweet and quote tweet here: Massimo, can't recall if I shared that I co-chaired a Congressional Briefing on Computer Ethics in DC, 30 years ago; and continue to pay attention. If I was hosting an AI Briefing today, I'd be inclined to suggest most are missing a deciding factor, namely, God participation. Quote tweet: end/ If AI-enhanced weaponization of mediated reality effectively represents the 'peak manipulation' of 'the rulers of the darkness of this world', a yet larger evolutionary trend subverts the whole big lie in a common, positive experiential turn toward Reality with a capital R.

Open original document

Extended description

Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge quoting Jean Houston and Michael Heim in two bodies Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: True the Technium / Is subtweeted Source: Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. Copy of Tweet: Nick Routledge True, the Technium Cult is, for the most part, missing it; where others, for their part, are blind to the evolutionary metaphysics of computer-mediated communion. Say what!? Twitter!? This stuff!? A transcendent experience!? Jean Houston: "Teilhard's noosphere is alive and well." With screenshot of Tweet: Nick Routledge Is 'subtweeted' a theological term? I suppose it properly should be. "Hypertext," noted Michael Heim, in his 1993 text, 'The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality', "refers to the existence of a hidden or unnoticed dimension." With Quote Tweet: Nick Routledge 3/ A way forward? The unicity of both realms as One conjoined reality? An experiential singularity. Teilhard de Chardin, for example, anticipated a radical, evolutionary, noospheric-enabled evocation of a higher sanity, in which we discover our shared soul. Cyberspace, holy, too.

Open original document

Extended description

Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Joe/Joseph Norman, left half of lower tiny thumbnail Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: not from AI / real / adapts / first hand / mind Source: Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. Copy of tweet: Joe Norman The real transition will come not from AI generated media fooling people into thinking fake things are real It will come when everyone adapts into assuming they are not, only trusting what they see first hand The re-localization of the mind.

Open original document

Extended description

Pictured speaker / quoted attribution: Nick Routledge, right half of lower tiny thumbnail Saved source record associated with pictured writing; full saved record, not an exact pictured excerpt. Passage boundary: substrative / furrows / circuit / planetary / renewing Source: Preserve quoted-author distinctions; the containing tweet does not confer authorship. @johnrobb end/ 'Owned' by the substrative deception of an enslaving epistemology fixed into furrows of death? More than likely, yes. What form a planetary circuit breaker, then? World liberation, as disruption and migration of planetary attention span? This time, a renewing network swarm.

Open original document
View this post’s context →

Context in the archive

Quoted byRT @nick_routledge: @amicusadastra @lukeburgis Speak of the devil. History following an apocalyptic logic goes both ways, of course - the advance of a dark corruption, yes, but simultaneously conjoined with humanity's equally mysterious vocation to betterment. Until, that is, 'apocalypsis', our moment of vision and decision.Quoted by@amicusadastra @lukeburgis Speak of the devil. History following an apocalyptic logic goes both ways, of course - the advance of a dark corruption, yes, but simultaneously conjoined with humanity's equally mysterious vocation to betterment. Until, that is, 'apocalypsis', our moment of vision and decision.