Nick Routledge@nick_routledge
Reply to @RichardRohrOFM

@RichardRohrOFM I’m reminded of James Hillman’s assertion that historic religion’s paramount incoherence lies not in the strength of its robust attempts to recover the invisible foundations of culture, but ‘its menace in how it proceeds.’ An essentially planetary perspective, isn’t it?

Quoted or linked post

Nick Routledge@nick_routledge · 10 Nov 2021

@omniscommunia @fxxfy @suzania Perhaps the label was inevitable. God is greater than all religion: any attempt to institutionalize the God force inexorably manifests as structurally implicit repression, however and wherever it lands. What a mess, this universal, global, religious conundrum.

View this post’s context →

Context in the archive

Quoted byRT @nick_routledge: @antoniogm Well, they haven’t. Purity cults were never going to get us here (“The Law”, but patriarchal calculus for the ego) and besides, the Abrahamic current no more owns the sunburst of the messianic than Jeff Bezos, your soul. The field, planetary: the common creed and language, love.Quoted by@antoniogm Well, they haven’t. Purity cults were never going to get us here (“The Law”, but patriarchal calculus for the ego) and besides, the Abrahamic current no more owns the sunburst of the messianic than Jeff Bezos, your soul. The field, planetary: the common creed and language, love.