Nick Routledge@nick_routledge

4/ @MelissaFloBix @IrkedIndeed Take theological avowals of sacred violence, for example. What on earth distinguishes the Crusader from the Jihadist in this regard? Answer: nothing. Both, the demonic parody, the anti-Christ, the lowest form of violence. thewordmadevisible.wordpress.com/about/the-politically-incorrect-guide-to-islam/

Context in the archive

Quoted by@seenunseenmag 11/ And if the Church must be global as Alicia says, which Church? The one whose reconciling horizon crosses every border—or the one that weaponizes borders in Jesus' name? The question isn't rhetorical. Christian nationalism is already a transnational export, marked by atrocity.Quoted by@BrianZahnd 2/ We would do well, perhaps, to recognize that even as US-based Christian nationalists identify as quintessentially American, their call to arms has nevertheless metastasized. Already, the world over, Christian ethno-nationalists are killing other Christians in our name.Quoted by@AmarAmarasingam @ShakiraSecurity @ToreRHamming How’s it going? “...twenty years after the 9/11 attacks, the jihadist movement appears, at least in terms of geographical presence and numerical support, stronger than ever...”Quoted by5/ Takes dealing with it on a first-name basis, I have found. ?s=20Quoted by@BillCorbett To address the demonic, we must first name it. ?s=20Quoted byA storm in a teacup, to a degree but, yes, the EWTN crew are problematic. https://x.com/rightscholar/status/1303366807651262465